Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Correct. We 'mark' no longer used database objects for removal at some future date. And mark is really just add a ticket to be completed in the future.



Do you have a method to rollback database object removals if they cause problems?


Assuming one step per day to rename a column: create new column, update code to write to new and old, update code to read from new, update code only write to new, rename old to something like xxx_del_pending, delete old column.

This process lets you validate and rollback/recover if needed.


Is there a quicker but still fairly safe alternative to this? If you're working solo for example, this doesn't sound practical.


I'll answer both your questions here. Yes, we can rollback a db change using migrates but usually a true rollback requires a restore since data will be lost.

In general what I have found is that database changes are unique to your situation. When an app is small it's fine for them to automatically run with the code commits. The system I deal with now has some very large tables, and running database migrations often requires planning. A column addition might be added weeks before the code is written to use the new column. It's just the nature of dealing with large tables.

Working solo, typically also means smaller, so there is a lot more leeway. I would do whatever works for you, and realize it's a good thing if you ever large enough to need to address other problems.


How long does it stick around before final removal, typically?


Depends. Table removals are usually quicker because they have zero system impact once all the references in code have been removed. Column removals can require planning depending on the size of the table and if indexes will have to be changed.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: