There are good reasons to make all communication, even trivial conversations, secure.
If we only secure "important" communications then we are unnecessarily broadcasting useful meta information to prospective attackers. Encrypted communications rise to the foreground in visibility and that gives away who and when and where sensitive information is shared.
OTOH, if we secure all communication then we make the work of attackers or over-reaching governments much more difficult because no communication clearly says "high value sensitive information"
There's plenty of reasons to secure all communication as much as possible, regardless of the content.
Even if you don't care about what your ISP sees from a privacy standpoint, they still can inject ads or other content into your webpages if the connection isn't secured (at least, from the perspective of your ISP). And this helps prevent attacks against users in coffee shops or other public, unsecured WiFi.
An example may illustrate my point: download software zip/tar files from a non-secure link. Obtain the signature and checksum files over a secure link, and verify the integrity of the software offline.
Not every communication is about hiding personal stuff.
And then find that your file doesn't match, because your ISP brokenly injected a human-targeted message at the start of your download, or some proxy corrupted it by stripping out the executable (yes, this happens)...
Absolutely nothing is lost by encrypting the downloaded data as well.
These numbers are meaningless without a proper context and can potentially create a "security theater".