Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

... while also considering the possibility of faulty software updates, bugs, and network attackers -- in an environment where hardware, network protocols, and APIs are proprietary and inscrutable.

And would we know if they had been recording unnecessarily?




Well they don't have big hard drives, so you can be confident they're not recording everything to disk that then could be unintentionally accessed or sent out later.

And you can look at network traffic (e.g. from wifi router stats) to be pretty confident they're not constantly live-streaming audio up to the cloud.

Of course most people will not actually do this monitoring themselves, but there are enough of these devices out there that if a significant number started recording constantly somebody would notice pretty quickly. And that would be terrible PR for the company involved, so I think google and amazon and apple have a pretty strong incentive not to do this.


How much of a hard drive would they need to do speech-to-text and upload that periodically in with other legitimate traffic?

The PR angle isn't that reassuring to me either, they've already absorbed some pretty bad PR hits on these devices and they're still going strong.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: