>> If you disagree I’d love to understand your viewpoint as to why.
I'm a underrepresented minority in just about everywhere but tech, yet you draw the line "at tech" for some arbitrary reason (as if my place of work or work opportunities defines who I am).
This is why I disagree. Someone is making arbitrary groups of underrepresentation and/or minority harm who have no real claim over said power.
Also:
>> I will say that it takes a certain level of privilege...
I am one of said underrepresented minorities "not in tech" (I also don't work in tech anymore, so I guess I'm in the clear now) who have no interest or desire to talk politics at work. Not when I was poor and drawing on EBT/SNAP/WIC and not when I've been well off, or anywhere in between.
There is no absolute reason you have to be privileged to not want to talk about politics at work. This is a majorly false assumption.
>> If you disagree I’d love to understand your viewpoint as to why.
I'm a underrepresented minority in just about everywhere but tech, yet you draw the line "at tech" for some arbitrary reason (as if my place of work or work opportunities defines who I am).
This is why I disagree. Someone is making arbitrary groups of underrepresentation and/or minority harm who have no real claim over said power.
Also:
>> I will say that it takes a certain level of privilege...
I am one of said underrepresented minorities "not in tech" (I also don't work in tech anymore, so I guess I'm in the clear now) who have no interest or desire to talk politics at work. Not when I was poor and drawing on EBT/SNAP/WIC and not when I've been well off, or anywhere in between.
There is no absolute reason you have to be privileged to not want to talk about politics at work. This is a majorly false assumption.