I get where you are coming from, and the cost of upkeep can certainly be high, especially on older homes.
But surely the cost of
(apartment rent + other associated costs) * however many months
is going to be higher than
(cost of house + interest from mortgage + upkeep + increased utilities) - (eventual price you sell it for)
The apartment situation you will always be negative, whereas even if you only end up selling your house for the same price you bought it at, you've only paid for interest + upkeep + utilities. The interest + upkeep are certainly not insignificant, but when your rent is as high as the mortgage cost, surely buying has got to be the better option over the longterm.
But surely the cost of (apartment rent + other associated costs) * however many months is going to be higher than (cost of house + interest from mortgage + upkeep + increased utilities) - (eventual price you sell it for)
The apartment situation you will always be negative, whereas even if you only end up selling your house for the same price you bought it at, you've only paid for interest + upkeep + utilities. The interest + upkeep are certainly not insignificant, but when your rent is as high as the mortgage cost, surely buying has got to be the better option over the longterm.
But maybe I'm just fooling myself.