Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Check != Cashier's check

The former is what you're describing. The latter is where the bank takes the funds from you then itself guarantees the piece of paper. Much more like an arbitrarily denominated bit of cash often used in large transactions in the States when (1) a seller doesn't trust the buyer too much or (2) the seller wants the funds to clear more quickly.

Also, regular checks are great. There's something about having to physically take time to spend money via a goofy little ritual that makes it easier to save the stuff.




Cashier's cheques are needed in the US because of fundamental distrust between financial institutions. Funds clearing more quickly... Because the process is locked to physical paper moments and could be milliseconds but no because cheques.

If there is so much distrust between buyer and seller,why hasnt western financial civilization in europe tanked by now?

I get cashier cheques aren't personal cheques but the underlying logic of why they exist is because of legacy reasons which are inefficient and reinforce bad behaviours.


When I bought my apartment in Spain, I had to get a Cashier's check for both the deposit and the final purchase.

There's apparently still some utility in them in parts of Europe. When I challenged it (I had to pay 80 EUR for the check!) I was told that a bank transfer could be reversed or canceled, and that Cashier's checks prevent that from happening.

I don't see this situation changing until the banks get together with the central bank and create a unified escrow system to replace Cashier's checks.

As of now, they don't see the benefits of changing to a new system outweighing the costs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: