Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> He is a pedophile. How could he not be?

I believe the confusion is that you're using "pedophile" to mean "attracted to anyone below the age of consent" while pedophile originally means "attracted to prepubescent children". In that regard, you're most certainly not a pedophile if you're attracted to a 17 year old that has gone through puberty. That's also what RMS was referring to if I recall his email correctly.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: