It's a loose term with little meaning.. or at least, without more effort to restrict the data. Even in your examples.
I would think, if "most evolved" with no other information was used, some type of bacteria or small, rapidly breeding being would vastly be "most evolved". As evolution is merely about change over time, the number of iterations would be all that matters, I would think?
I know nothing of the scientific terms backing any of this, so perhaps there are measurable scientific methods for determining "most evolved". But I suspect it is a common, mostly useless term.
I would think, if "most evolved" with no other information was used, some type of bacteria or small, rapidly breeding being would vastly be "most evolved". As evolution is merely about change over time, the number of iterations would be all that matters, I would think?
I know nothing of the scientific terms backing any of this, so perhaps there are measurable scientific methods for determining "most evolved". But I suspect it is a common, mostly useless term.