Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

FTA:

"This is all related to the Universal Postal Union agreement that allows Chinese sellers to ship products to the U.S. for less than it costs us to ship to the same state."

The USPS has been losing money on this arrangement for a long time, it's one of these things that has stuck around despite being a total embarrassment due to industry pressuring. There is no reason taxpayers should be subsidizing this -- in fact, THAT is the most American of tales, everyday Americans paying for the privilege of bad downstream consequences.



This is not limited to the US. I believe it is worldwide and it is certainly the same in The Netherlands.

edit: I believe there has been some change recently, the 'ePacket' ? Which is not delivered to your door, but you have to fetch it at a postal point.


https://www.lawfareblog.com/withdrawal-universal-postal-unio... has a deep breakdown, I was just speaking to the consequences the USPS (which handles international mail in the US) felt from the price setting that occurs under UPU.


I was not refuting your point, just trying to give your comment broader meaning.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: