In the 1950s, building a moonbase would have been an engineering and technological challenge.
Today, it's basically a political and economics challenge, to convince enough people it would be worth while to spend the time and effort to do it. Which is not to say there wouldn't be engineers involved, solving new problems, but we already know enough of the solutions that it's not really the sticking point now.
(Which is to agree with you, a lot of things are organizational problems at this point.)
> "Today, it's basically a political and economics challenge, to convince enough people it would be worth while to spend the time and effort to do it."
There's a quote by (I believe) Winston Churchill - which I can't seem to find atm - that goes something along the lines of:
Winning a war/battle is relatively easy. It's convincing them to let you fight that's far more difficult.
The 50s were during the Cold War so building a moon base was absolutely a political challenge. It just so happens that it was an internal political challenge rather than an internal one.
Today, it's basically a political and economics challenge, to convince enough people it would be worth while to spend the time and effort to do it. Which is not to say there wouldn't be engineers involved, solving new problems, but we already know enough of the solutions that it's not really the sticking point now.
(Which is to agree with you, a lot of things are organizational problems at this point.)