I never said any of that, and am assuming you signed up for this throw away assuming I'd downvote you, or you're afraid of using your real account for some stupid reason?
I said simply that if someone signs a legal contract and one side breaks it, the other party is well within their bounds to investigate it and potentially to litigate it as well. This is how contracts work unless they're deemed to break a law. Then a judge will invalidate it.
Do I think suing employees is good for business, or for a public image? No, I think it is terrible. You're the one who tried to put words into my mouth I never once stated.
You asked, and I quote: "Why wouldn't they go after someone breaching their NDA?"
If this was a rhetorical assertion that there is no reason for Tesla not to sue, then you should admit that you took the position that I described, you should stop pretending that I put words in your mouth, and you should apologize to me for your feigned outrage.
If you were actually asking why Tesla wouldn't use every legal tool available to them, then you should thank me for providing you with a thoughtful answer, and then apologize for attacking me and my character.
I said simply that if someone signs a legal contract and one side breaks it, the other party is well within their bounds to investigate it and potentially to litigate it as well. This is how contracts work unless they're deemed to break a law. Then a judge will invalidate it.
Do I think suing employees is good for business, or for a public image? No, I think it is terrible. You're the one who tried to put words into my mouth I never once stated.