I wasn't aware of that, but given the transaction capabilities, it makes sense. I primarily use InnoDB and have never had any similar performance issues, so I havn't looked into it heavily...
MySQL InnoDB tables handle the use case much much better, so just guessing but it's probably a difference in how the indexes handle updates/multiple versions and how the query planner works for dirty indexes.
That said, MySQL does have more mature replication options built-in.