Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When open source projects get VC funding, it makes me trust them less. Eventually, the investors are going to want their money back with a profit. When that happens, the companies are going to try to monetize their offering often in ways that are detrimental to the open source project.


Any VC funded company gives me this feeling.

Twitter scaled up ads a whole lot to become solvent.

Moviepass went from an amazing deal to an okay one.

Netflix's content catalog and price went from great to okay.

Facebook went from "Myspace but with photos" to the massive advertising machine it is today.

The great-for-users but usually lossy beginnings of these companies are a play to acquire users, so they can pull the profit switch later on.


Just wait till Uber and Lyft investors start demanding profits...


FWIW Moviepass never had a sustainable business model. They were loosing a lot of money from the get-go.


Arguably many VC funded companies don't have a sustainable model...


I'd say I trust more companies that already are earning money and open source something, it's less likely that they will bait and switch to a proprietary. Or some like mattermost or mariadb are clean about a possible business plan. Way better than a non standard open source license and vague prospects of VC money.


Can you explain with an example what you mean by "detrimental to the open source project"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: