Note that the CRAPL license is not an open source license. It is extremely restrictive about what you can do with the code. It doesn't even give you permission to share the code with anyone else.
It's also poor for people distributing code under the license. It jokes about how the program was constructed without thought or design, but that's the very basis of the program's copyright protection. If you ever try to enforce the license, you might regret having to spend time arguing the implications of that joke in court.
Nobody should ever use CRAPL. Use the MIT or GPL licenses and set expectations for maintenance or support to zero in the README as you said.
It's also poor for people distributing code under the license. It jokes about how the program was constructed without thought or design, but that's the very basis of the program's copyright protection. If you ever try to enforce the license, you might regret having to spend time arguing the implications of that joke in court.
Nobody should ever use CRAPL. Use the MIT or GPL licenses and set expectations for maintenance or support to zero in the README as you said.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9670497