The Japanese seem to make really good writing instruments in general.
My daily driver for writing is a Mitsubishi uni-ball eye. Only costs a few bucks and it's miles better than a 10 cent Bic.
I'm not some kind of pen snob who knows all about different pens, but I know a good pen when I use one. I've found that it makes my (usually unintelligible) handwriting a lot better too.
I guess it's maybe a cultural thing, I've heard that the Japanese still place a lot of emphasis on handwriting letters and notes. Meanwhile there's people in my office who haven't touched a pen in weeks.
Yea, what's up with that, actually? Why are they so good at making pretty much anything over there?
Writing utensils:
毛笔 - "maobi," the brush one uses to write calligraphy. Brought to Japan by the Chinese thousand years ago or so, now they make the best
Paper. Midori and Mio. Nigh untouchable. The only people that come close are Leuchtturm, IMO. And it's cheap!
Fountain Pens. Actually the Taiwanese do well here as well, but nobody can take on the behemoth, Pilot.
Cars: Toyota. Honda. Well regarded as the most repairable, built-to-last cars in the world. Mitsubishi, Nissan, Mazda coming out with excellent sports cars.
Motorcycles: Suzuki tops the line when it comes to dependability, repairability, durability, and quality. Spend a week pulling apart and putting together an SV650, then do a Ducati Monster, you'll see what I mean (if you can even find the tools to start unbolting shit off the Ducati)
Construction equipment: Komatsu, Hitachi. Some prefer Caterpillar but not for me.
Extraterrestrial Equipment: Walk through the full-size model of the ISS in the Johnson Space Center, Houston. You've got the Russian model, carved out of solid blocks of aluminum. The American one, which feels like being inside of a tricked out Ford f150, cheap panels and all. Then you step in the Japanese one, an over-engineered masterpiece in interior design. Everything has a little cubby, space, place. So organized, so perfect.
How do they do it???
Edit: I'm genuinely trying to think of something I trust some other country to make better than the Japanese and having a hard time. Maybe bicycles - can't beat the Taiwanese with Giant... but then again everyone uses Shimano components.
Uh, phones? Samsung I guess?
Laptops, I generally go for Lenovo, so there. That's all I can think of.
My guess. Japanese have long valued mastery and specialization. Historically a cast society, people were expected to dedicate their entire lives to the line of work their biological or adopted family was known for.
The country also went to great pains to isolate themselves so this system continued for much longer than other parts of the world where sources of wealth were more diversified. In Japan wealth came from being known as the best at your craft, which fostered a culture of continuous improvement.
In much of Asia perfection of art was seen as a sign of sophistication for the wealthy. But the cultural revolution in China really dampened that for much of China’s sphere of influence.
After WW-II Japan was forced to modernize. Western manufacturing and improvement processes came in. The manufacturing was new but the culture of continuous improvement and mastery was already well established in Japanese culture but didn’t exist in the West where modernization was really a battle between the use of slave labor / child labor vs machines and the concept of continuous improvement was a new thing.
But I wonder, can we say the same about German engineering vs Russian engineering?
I love Japanese high quality items, but I think we worship them a bit due to the fact that they are foreign imports from a different culture. For some categories mentioned by the OP, some non-Japanese items are superior.
In the same way, the Japanese worship even more some Western goods and have gone out of their way to copy and sometimes improve them. For example, there is a whole subculture in Japan that adores old American tees and denim. They create exceptionally high quality reproductions using original equipment [1].
There are plenty of areas where Japanese have lost to competitors. Their sweet is making things that are hard and expensive do well. The most important components of our iPhones can only be made in Japan because of their attention to detail. They still make pretty good swords and knives!
An interesting thing I remember reading about Japan was that post war it rapidly industrialised with massive success in a very short amount of time. Something which brought great pain and poor conditions to many countries that tried to do the same.
In modern Japanese factories, master craftsmen are referred to as kami-sama, gods. Not, you know, monotheistic or Olympian gods with pretensions to universality, but Shinto gods, the kind of god that might belong to the huge old tree that sticks out above the top of the forest. It's not a sarcastic title; the respect is real. Japanese companies are run by businessmen, just like companies in the US, but they still have to treat the makers with respect.
Probably helps that you can't fire anybody, and if you get a job, that job is likely the one you'll have to live in for life. Workers aren't disposable, and neither are jobs. Karoshi is still a bigger problem than precarización, which is what we call the gig economy here in Argentina.
> Probably helps that you can't fire anybody, and if you get a job, that job is likely the one you'll have to live in for life. Workers aren't disposable, and neither are jobs.
Could be. Didn't stop the USSR from churning out heaping mounds of hot garbage, though.
It was more a result of bad planning and bad incentives. Corporations are similarly centrally planned, but the quarter plan is in many ways as bad as 5 year one.
Good companies mix both long term planning and reactive processes
Arguably, that advantages companies that can hack that metric -- as anything they do to survive (politics) is treated as a reverse proxy for the value they bring to the market. This is why "too big to fail" and "job creator" became mantras.
My instinct here is that master craftspeople need a certain amount of autonomy to do good work, and if they are working for bosses, that requires high trust for the craftspeople on the part of the bosses. That trust was not present either in Fordism nor in the vulgar Soviet imitation of Fordism, but I think it is widespread in Japan. (I have never been inside a Japanese factory, though, so that is hearsay on my part.)
I suggest that perhaps one factor that makes this trust hard to achieve in the US today is the greater misalignment of incentives that comes with making the principal–agent relationship so temporary. But clearly that is not the only situation where trust could be low. I think we can agree that, despite Stakhanovite rhetoric, trust and autonomy was very low for most workers in the USSR, no?
(Also, the USSR did remarkably well at producing products considering the impoverished capital and skill basis it started from, and also considering the destruction of the German invasion. From the October Revolution to Sputnik was only 40 years: in two generations of bloody genocide, from a backward peasant society to world technological leadership.)
Quality is part of Japanese culture. You really see it when you walk around on the streets there. Our grandparents' lamentations of 'things used to last longer and be higher quality' would make no sense to a Japanese person because their culture never underwent the same cheapening that we did. (Assuming our grandparents were being completely honest)
In my experience, things in Japan tend to be higher quality, cleaner, and much more expensive. The three things I think of when I think about my time there are the clean streets, the old, clean, and eerily on-time public transportation, and the individually wrapped perfectly shiny apples at the grocery store.
What do you mean by “you can see it when you walk around the streets in here”? Did you spend all your time in central Tokyo? Because all i see around me when i go for a walk are buildings no one seems to care enough to renovate them and honestly it amazes me. All those amazing products you see that come from japan are usually made in a buildings that look like makeshift houses and are built in the middle of a nowhere.
I could never imagine japan being what it is by just from walking around in here.
I remember seeing a documentary about one of the top handmade Japanese knives. I was amazed that it's literally made in the craftsman's falling down house, on a normal street in a normal rural village. I wish I remembered the name of the brand. It's quite well known. The knives are beautiful, but the workshop is function over form to put it mildly (I seem to remember he didn't even have a floor in his workshop -- which makes a lot of sense, but still surprising).
Before a first moved to Japan a friend warned me that Japanese cities are generally ugly. You've got power and telephone wires everywhere. The buildings are old, rusting, and falling apart. There are weeds growing in cracks everywhere. But if you go inside a person's home, there is this amazing transformation. It's usually beautiful. Even in an old falling down home, the interior is often wonderful (of course everyone is different and especially elderly people often have difficulty cleaning their houses). This is often true of izakayas (bar/restaurants) as well. From the outside it looks utterly uninspiring, but it's often really amazing on the inside (although, not always ;-) ).
I never really had any expectations when I came here, so I was never disappointed. I know a lot of expats, though, who were crushed when they discovered that not everything in Japan is beautiful.
Homes and condo buildings in Japan aren't supposed to last more than 40 years. It's supposed to keep the national economy in a constant state of development (sort of good) but it also means most people can't make a good long term investment off home ownership (which is bad). Either way, yeah, there's no incentive to renovate, because they won't be up for too long. On top of that, a lot of them need to be refurnished or rebuilt to be quake-proof, but it's not affordable, so they may opt to wait until the next big one brings it down.
> it also means most people can't make a good long term investment off home ownership (which is bad)
There’s a theory that homes being a good long-term investment is incompatible with homes being affordable. If true, then I would argue that it’s good, not bad.
Under a rising population in a region, demand increases, which should increase the per sq. foot cost of housing, reflecting the need for denser living.
I lived there for 4 months. Hokkaido, Tokyo, and Osaka mostly. I feel like I got enough of a sampling.
They have old buildings, sure. But the streets are clean and well kept, it's a night and day difference b/t the U.S. and comparably dense Japanese regions.
Different people/cultures are good at different things. The Japanese are really good at taking an existing product and making it much better in terms of quality, durability, finish, etc.
However saying that the Japanese are better at everything does injustice to western society - which incidentally has had a stellar record inventing everything from cars to planes to cameras. Sure, the finish and panache of the final product may be lacking a little, but without the fierce can-do attitude and i-dont-care-for-authority attitude that is a hallmark of western society, none of these might have come to be.
Lechtturm recently moved production to China, with the expected drop in quality.
> But then again everyone uses Shimano components.
Manufacturing of nearly all Shimano components these days is now done in China or Malaysia. Sure, there is Japanese firm overseeing that manufacturing, but modern Shimano is a different beast than those classic Japanese bicycle-component brands like Nitto that are still made in Japan.
I think Leuchtturm was not a particularly good paper.
Midori is very good, but they are not a paper mill. And they don't disclose who produces their raw sheets. An example of a good Japanese paper mill is Tomoe River, who perhaps also supply Midori.
In my opinion, the best paper out there comes from Fabriano, which has additional advantage of being totally chlorine free and pulp has been sourced from biologically controlled crops in Italy.
Regarding pens, Pilot is very good. But if talking about Japan, we should also mention Platinum (and more importantly their sister company Nakaya) plus, at least, Sailor.
There are also exceptionally good non-Japanese pen manufactures out there. One example is Conid. Or Romillo.
I also love Japanese goods, but it's nice to keep a balanced perspective. Some Western brands are on the same level of quality. In fact, if you go to Japan, they will worship some Western brands.
Speaking of fountain pens and Japan; in Japan you can find these compact-sized cartridge fountain pens for ￥200. E.g. at LOFT. They are decent; just the handle is simple transparent plastic.
>Japanese made products used to be synonymous to 'cheap' and 'poor quality.' It was not until July 1950 when Dr. Edwards Deming (1900-1993) introduced SQC to the Japanese industry audience, using the trademark colored-beads experiment.
>Eizaburo Nishibori, one of the country's post-war quality pioneers, describes in a book* the humble initial encounter to modern quality concepts that preceded Deming's historic 8-day seminar.
>It was during American occupation of Japan (1945- 1952) when GHQ (offices of the Allied occupation) placed an order of vacuum tubes to Toshiba. Nishibori recalled the American officers wanted to see a 'control chart' from the manufacturing process being used to produce their order. No one at Toshiba knew what it was. "You don't know a control chart? How do you plan to manage quality?" Nishibori remembers replying, "If we, engineers at Toshiba, don't know it, most likely no one in Japan knows."
They are good at making quality because they learned how and started doing it. In the 1960s "make in Japan" was synonymous with cheap junk - what China is today (perhaps worse?). There are complex reasons why most countries go through this, I can list some of the factors but I don't know them all (I doubt anyone does)
Hammers. The Germans make better industrial hammers.
What ever happened to Japanese laptops anyway? I used to have a little bitty Fuji and I loved it, back then Sony also had super great industrial design, really offering an alternative to Apple that was at least as cool-looking. Is that just not a thing anymore?
All I can figure is Sony got a taste of that sweet sweet BS money (that made from IP and online services rather than products per se, that is) and got lost in it.
Malcolm Gladwell has a chunk of one of his books devoted to this. The theory he uses is that growing rice in paddies is painstaking and meticulous work, where attention to detail and constant refinement are necessary for a good crop, whereas wheat or soybeans don’t need this level of work.
This would predict the same attention to quality and continuous improvement in all rice paddy reliant cultures. China disproves this hypothesis. Even very, very expensive apartments in Shanghai often have terrible quality finish. It looks great when new but even a couple of years later things start to fall apart in most places. And it isn’t confined to accommodation. It’s amazingly difficult to get people to actually follow a maintenance schedule for equipment, even extremely expensive manufacturing equipment. When most of the workforce is at best two generations removed from peasants and most aren’t even one an attitude of “Fuck it, it’ll do.” is pervasive.
For bikes (bicycles) I'd say it depends. For daily commutes and leisure trips, you can't beat Gazelle. But then again, maybe you're thinking of racing bikes and using bikes for sports.
Unless you want to use your laptop to type, of course ;)
Nobody can beat Lenovo, IMO. The Thinkpad x1 carbon as an example. Lighter than a MacBook pro. More ports. A keyboard that not only isn't defeated by a single grain of sand, but is also just a delightful keyboard. Put whatever OS you want on it. Far cheaper.
>there's people in my office who haven't touched a pen in weeks.
After I realized in my second year of university that I cannot read my own notes, I switched to the laptop as my primary note-making tool. That's been... almost two decades ago.
I'll take a dry marker to architect and brainstorm on whiteboard any day of the week; but I touch pens very very little (and if I have to make notes, I'll do block capitals; I can do cursive of course... I just never do. I had an interesting conversation with a school principal who insisted cursive is a core skill that should never be omitted. I view it as calligraphy - a historically relevant and necessary mechanism that today is a quaint way of expressing your uniqueness and artistic prowess, but certainly not a mandatory aspect of modern living)
I agree in principle that note-taking can enhance memory and retention; but I've found that today, typing my notes does the trick for me - especially because I use indented/hierarchical lists frequently, and update/re-org them as I go; so they help me build a mental model of material or actions we covered.
By the end of note-taking session, my OneNote file will have notes organized in the way which makes sense to me and in which way I want to remember them - whereas hand-written notes would (for me) be inherently more sequential. As yourself therefore, I retain the list of key points or actions far better than if I didn't take those notes - even if I don't refer to them later.
(as well, I'm a touch-typist, so I can look at the person or whiteboard/screen while typing, which again I personally couldn't do while hand-writing).
So it may be whatever works for any given person - or, whatever people get used to. It'd be curious to see if typed notes would provide same benefit to you after, say, a few months commitment? Or it may be that I switched early enough in life; or, to quote Lady Gaga, maybe I was just born that way :->
I need the notes too. I rarely refer back to them but writing them is an art for me. It almost functions as a memory palace of sorts. I’ve done notes on an iPad Pro but I prefer pencil, colored pens, and paper.
Muji has US stores. And their gel pens I think must be OEM by Zebra. The Zebra Sarasa has a different clip, but the parts are interchangeable, I took one of each apart and made two hybridd.
Uni-balls will forever be my favorite pens. The right amount of flow and resistance. Clear, strong lines that don't bleed and smear. I've tried so many other pens and they just making writing misery. Uni-ball for life.
> I guess it's maybe a cultural thing, I've heard that the Japanese still place a lot of emphasis on handwriting letters and notes.
Sorry to be this guy, but, nope. It's quite opposite. Old generation, yes, they do. New generation, especially smartphone generation, are not writing anymore. And to the point that they have problems with handwriting some kanji characters. Most of the stuff is printed, now, or written on the keyboard slash phone. It's just much faster for them. OTOH it's hard to blame them. Kanji characters require much more effort to write properly and there's much more of them to remember than Latin letters.
It's definitely cultural, but I think this is something different. Obviously it's generalization and my opinion, but I deeply think there is something to it.
Like any other nation I know, Japanese tend to master things they do. I've experienced this first hand. They can perform a single task whole life, improving it, until they become exceptionally good at it. It may seem to be a tedious everyday chore, but through all repetition and improvement they are raising it to the level of art. Often, they even put an additional effort for something that doesn't directly pay off financially but increase esthetics, comfort and overall experience. I love them for that and I hope they'll never change, for the sake of the whole world drowning in a sea of ugly, cheap and minimal effort products.
I listed after those for a couple years before getting a few. I found that without realizing it I had already been rotating my pencil between every few strokes and that made them not work so well. I can't seem to break the habit so I have gone back to wood pencils.
I think it is because of Zen, most people in Japan don't actively practice Zen anymore but the influence is still there. Think of the tea ceremony, Bonsai trees, sword making etc, everything should be perfect, clean, minimalism that is how one reaches Satori, the Japanese are very self conscious. Same principles of zen applied to the modern world.
Yesssss! I regret not having brought back more. I can't for the life of me find the same quality uni ball pens anywhere in the US or online.
They definitely take handwritten notes far more seriously in Japan. The have Stationary stores everywhere there and they literally just sell writing utensils and paper/notebooks.
Is it Japanese or Mitsubushi especially? They're pretty much synonymous with high quality work vehicles but very few of the other products they make seem to get exported. I had a great Mitsubishi TV once, but when it had to be replaced they'd disappeared from the market.
It is pure joy to come to class with a fully prepared math lesson on yellow legal paper, take attendance, clear the board, and start, filling three, maybe four boards with precise alphanumeric characters, graphs or diagrams, and a confident cadence that allows for good questions, good notes, and a positive learning environment.
When good chalk hits good slate there is an immediate sense of responsibility with respect to what has been enabled.
I haven't had a good learning experience when the professor cleared the boards, and filled them with precise characters, graphs or diagrams. Good chalk can't fix ex-cathedra teaching.
I was first introduced to Hagoromo about four years ago when the word had just come out that they were closing shop. A colleague of mine was in love with it, and ordered several boxes. I managed to get two sticks of the stuff and used it sparingly for quite a long time. It really is way better than the majority of chalks. It's coated in a thin film so your hands don't get dirty and it's extremely fine making it smooth to write with.
The article is a little comical about the effects of using the chalk, but due to its scarcity, I've certainly heard that some use it only for the most important theorems.
I love how every community has their 'thing' that is sought after. Looking up chalk leads down a very narrow rabbit hole.
Some say that Hagoromo sold two of their compression molds to Sejong Corp (who also took the name), while the other went to Uma-Jirushi.
If I had a use for chalk, it'd be fun to try to create the perfect stick. Compression molds aren't hard to find or even make, then its down the mix. I assume that Hagoromo was using more than water and a super fine plaster (e.g. Plaster of Paris) with white Tempura paint..
Has anybody tried making chalk before? I've made chalkboard paint for signage (just unsanded grout and paint), but I never thought to take it a step further.
For anyone here who likes "mechanical keyboards" it may interest you to know that for the next 7 days some Hagoromo-chalk color-matched kits are available in a "group buy" on Massdrop[0]. The kit is for the alpha (i.e., the "letter and number") keys on your US-ANSI layout keyboard. There is also another kit, which in addition to having the standard letters and numbers, adds APL sublegends. There are a couple smaller kits that add the color to the F-row, and more interestingly, a "Vim Kit" which has left, down, up, and right arrows as sublegends on the H, J, K, and L keys - all in a color of ABS plastic matches to Hagoromo chalk.
I have a slight physiological twitch-like reaction to the feeling of chalk on my fingertips. It bothered me so much during my learning years that I did my best to avoid coming to a board at all. If anyone knows a correct term for this phenomenon, I'd be glad to read more about it.
I don't know if there's a name, but you're not alone. I f$%*ing hate chalk, so much that I started avoiding math classes at my school. Both the sound it makes and the feeling of it as you mention. Just thinking about it makes my skin crawl.
We're not crazy though. Just look at what chalk looks like under the microscope to see what your fingers are picking up on:
What I’d like to know is why, of all academics, only mathematicians care about chalk. Computer scientists? Nope. Statisticians? Nope. Physicists? Engineers? Nope, and nope. Only mathematicians.
And, don’t forget about boards. Real slate, please. Black. Large. Yes.
My experience is that almost all of my physics profs use chalk (that's the classrooms that we have, but no one's really complaining). Depending on the room and class size some engineering is still chalk, but more are migrating to whiteboard/digital.
Definitely not as much fervor for chalk, especially as it seems to do less well in larger classes/classrooms, but I do prefer it.
Real slate? Or hard surface wood with black chalkboard paint? And what can we create with the clear chalkboard paint? Two layers of black, a layer of blue grid marks, two layers of clear chalk paint? What perfect board to do both calc and graphs? Chalk is the yin, but have we found the ultimate boars yang?
Glass. Matt rough surface on the writing side. Painted on the backside. Could be with grid, dots and the like.
The thickness and transparency of the glass makes the chalk-writings cast a subtle shadow which gives a pleasant aura of expression.
I’ve met many kinds of blackboard in my career, glass is the ultimate in my opinion.
I graduated in this decade (from a large public university), and I would say that 90% of the worthwhile classes I took were taught on boards, and at least 50% of the classes taught via slides weren't worthwhile. It's not as uniform as you think.
I've heard chalk is better because the professor has to explain things as its written down, which helps with pacing the content. Powerpoint is easy to go too fast or too slow since the content is pre-generated. Since there's only a finite amount of space on the chalkboard, you might also need to be efficient with how you draw diagrams and formulas, which might also help with the pacing.
Ok, but why? You’re effectively saying they like it because they like it.
CS, stats, physics, engineering, etc. classes would all benefit from slowing down and explaining things the way mathematicians are forced to do using chalk.
Even chalk is inefficient though. One of the best math classes I had was taught on a projector with a wind-up transparent overlay. He'd use colored markers on the transparent sheet, and then wind up a little when he reached the bottom. If there was questions he could "rewind" to the point in question as nothing was ever erased. He then took the transparency roll to his office where it was available, in scroll-like form, during office hours.
All of the CS classes I've taken (at Waterloo) have featured professors who lecture while they write on the board. On the other hand, some of the stats and financial math courses I've taken relied heavily on slides.
I prefer no slides, personally, though my current instructor in differential equations is totally disorganized and frustrating to follow, despite using no slides at all.
>You’re effectively saying they like it because they like it.
no? you asked me why they like chalk not why the use chalk and slate?
>Ok, but why?
how should i know? i'm just reflecting on my experience. if i had to guess it's because math has a very strong computational component - you have to show kids how to perform the steps for to solve whatever problem (perform an integral, solve an ode, QR factor a matrix).
>CS, stats, physics, engineering, etc. classes would all benefit from slowing down and explaining things the way mathematicians are forced to do using chalk.
lol sure but almost no one cares about what's best for students (but about spending as little time as possible on teaching)
I teach in a humanities department, and vastly prefer chalk because it's more reliable than markers, erases more cleanly, and simply looks better. Several of my colleagues feel the same way. Anecdotal, of course.
The thing with chalk is: if you see a piece of chalk, you can use it. After you're done, put it down and forget it.
If you see a marker... 50% chance it's dead, 25% chance it's barely alive, 15% chance it's legible from the back row, 10% chance it's fresh and usable the way you describe it. It's impossible to tell before you try.
After you're done with it, you need to remember to close the cap, or find a trash can to chuck it into (and make a call if the marker kind-of-still-works-but-not-really). Seems like a small thing, but adds mental overhead. And it's a big enough overhead that a lot of people don't do it. Otherwise, how would we end up with the distribution above in the first place?
Now teaching/explaining is a performance art. Doing the "wait, let me try another marker, is it better now?" dance ruins the show.
That's why mathematicians prefer chalk. The subject matter is already difficult enough, there's not enough bandwidth for all of that nonsense. Have chalk, will write. End of story.
Also the markers are shit from a sustainability standpoint - non refillable, take up space in a landfill, as far as I know unrecyclable, manufacturing chain involving at the very least plastic, ink, and whatever makes the tip, and gets tossed seemingly on a daily basis.
But a chalkboard eraser just smears the chalk around. Even with a decently clean eraser, after a few write/erase cycles you can barely see anything because there's so little contrast. Dry eraser marker goes on vivid and sharp every time, and with a high-quality whiteboard will wipe right off cleanly.
When I TA'ed in Germany, every classroom had a sink, a sponge and a squeegee, so you actually cleaned the board every time instead of smearing it. It was great.
Must be pretty subjective; while I can certainly see how it could be satisfying, and very much believe there is difference between cheap & quality stuff; but I've personally always found the chalkboard experience grating and "sharp", whereas a good dry marker feels "smooth", "muted" and "elegant" :-/
(as a bonus, nobody I know has screamed and covered their ears due to inadvertent scratch of whiteboard :P )
I wish I liked them but I am psychosomatically incapable of writing on them. Even touching chalk gives me an intense negative physical reaction, let alone trying to pull the thing across a board. Just thinking about it makes my nails hurt. Fucking weird.
I'm also young, but I hate whiteboards. Much lower contrast than blackboards. Pens can't go over pens for emphasis or in a second colour. Pens basically can't be seen from the back.
My alma mater swapped blackboards for white while I was there, and I found the brand new whiteboards and pens far worse than the who-knows-how-old blackboards.
I think chalk sucks as they are dirty, messy, dusty and probably not good for your health. I hope for the day they all disappeared and are replaced by digital whiteboard where you don't need to erase anything and can be collaborative with remote location in real time.
It's amazing stuff. So smooth, so clean. I've resorted to keeping some in my backpack at all times. And anecdotally, I see more and more professors using it. Maybe good marketing at work?
Sidenote, I love the name MSRI, cause you can pronounce it "misery"
Interesting. I thought the stuff people generally wrote on blackboards with was actually gypsum, and not chalk at all. Although everyone calls it chalk.
My daily driver for writing is a Mitsubishi uni-ball eye. Only costs a few bucks and it's miles better than a 10 cent Bic.
I'm not some kind of pen snob who knows all about different pens, but I know a good pen when I use one. I've found that it makes my (usually unintelligible) handwriting a lot better too.
I guess it's maybe a cultural thing, I've heard that the Japanese still place a lot of emphasis on handwriting letters and notes. Meanwhile there's people in my office who haven't touched a pen in weeks.