Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You said "no they didn't" then described how they did exactly what the parent said, just with a gloss describing why they wanted to be allowed to "use it for evil".



Please no it just means their lawyers aren't morons. What's evil? Are they getting sued for charging interest? Selling products on Sunday? Supporting the sale of secular texts?


No. They want clarity on what’s considered evil. Or alternatively clarification what the license allows and disallows under which circumstances.


Yes, but this was, apparently achieve by getting included the option to do E AND the previously allowed ~E (according to the thread here).


No, the JSlint author responded to their request by granting them E in addition to ~E. It’s not what they initially asked for.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: