Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's almost as if we've tried something like that in the past, and the effort to avoid the worst issues was a monumental effort.



Confess I'm not quite clever enough to know what you mean or to what you're referring.


Y2K problem, because someone at some point decided that two digits was enough to represent years. Thus when 99 came to an end, the clock would show 00 for year. It was an undefined behavior how to interpret it.

The event was rather boring, because a huge effort went into making sure that critical infrastructure was "Y2K Ready".

So my point was that pushing the problem in front of us until it becomes too large to ignore, is not a good strategy when we're talking (it) infrastructure. Handling leap seconds every now and then are the lesser evil.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: