IMO, Jupyter Notebook is the closest equivalent to Python as what Rstudio is for R. While Pycharm and VSCode are also preferred by some Py-based Data scientists, Jupyterhub offers almost everything that a typical IDE would do along with the traditional Notebook environment which a lot of beginners these days start with. Thus much less friction while getting started.
I would be really hesitant to comapre Jupyter Notebook to an IDE.....an example is a debugger...the only visual debugger that i have come across for jupyter is pixie debugger, which is miles behind the debugger of an IDE like Pycharm.... there is a huge list of features that jupyter needs before you can compare it to an IDE
FWIW I use the %debug magic command in Jupyter and it has been a great experience. I'm pretty ignorant of the enterprise debugging tools so take that with a grain of salt.
Debuggers are only really useful if you're trying to figure out why some object in your server doesn't do what you want it to.
I'd wager that almost no data scientists write object oriented code.. it's probably mostly done one calculation at a time. executed in the notebooks repl. So the value you get from ide debuggers is tiny, as you're already doing everything one step at a time.
Correct. RStudio has this feature, where variable values can be inspected in a sidebar. This would be a really useful feature for Jupyter, especially when running a Python kernel.
Does it work with variables that are local to a function? I don't mean inspecting global variables after having executed a cell, but local variables in the middle of a function execution.
