I'm curious, if the message saying that "FB will also import contacts if you proceed" were still visible, would you still consider it "unauthorized access"? Is it really "unauthorized" if users give informed consent?
I doubt it, so it seems that we're just bickering over whether the accidental removal of the message is considered a "bug" or a malicious act by some engineer to trick users into sharing their data because they (and their company) lack business ethics.
Move fast and break things is not what one should do when dealing with personal information of billions of people. People need to be held accountable, Facebook has to be held accountable.
Maybe a complete engineering stop for a few months, and development of new practices and processes.
Similar to what Microsoft did with Bill Gates Trustworthy Computing memo which led to the creation of the Secure Development Lifecycle is something Zuckerberg should order to do.
I doubt it, so it seems that we're just bickering over whether the accidental removal of the message is considered a "bug" or a malicious act by some engineer to trick users into sharing their data because they (and their company) lack business ethics.
Which is more likely?