You skipped a step: demonstrate that the risk estimate is real, and not merely a guess.
I can’t help but draw the parallel to anti-vax logic: ”if it’s at all possible that my child might be seriously injured from a vaccine, then I must avoid vaccines!”
Setting a standard of “any risk is unacceptable because the downside risk is absolute” is also incorrect.
I can’t help but draw the parallel to anti-vax logic: ”if it’s at all possible that my child might be seriously injured from a vaccine, then I must avoid vaccines!”
Setting a standard of “any risk is unacceptable because the downside risk is absolute” is also incorrect.