Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes. Because it is technically almost impossible, if not completely impossible, to build a system that gives your code absolute freedom while not giving other code running on the system absolute freedom as well.

There will always be the possibility that some company will ask users to their absolute freedom ability to give them absolute freedom. Which is basically exactly what happened in this case. The only difference is, in this case, Apple built in a mechanism where they can stop individual actors.

And, to protect their users, they used it.



Protecting the users is marketing speech. The users had given consent. This was Apple using its control over app distribution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: