But package.d could lead you to overdepend on too many modules too :) it's mostl... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		p0nce on Jan 28, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: C++ Modules Might Be Dead-On-Arrival But package.d could lead you to overdepend on too many modules too :) it's mostly great for end applications rather than internal to libraries.

ben-schaaf on Jan 28, 2019 [–]

Sure, but that's not specific to package.d. See the earlier convention of all.d or d.d. That's the trade-off with having public imports. I don't see how this is related to my comment though?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact