I am not sure I understand what he is saying. All the "results" that he is talking about are the interpreted inputs for the application to process.
So for," What is seven hundred and forty four as a number? ", the interpreted input is a NumberQ function taking the main part "seven hundred and forty four as a number" and evaluating whether it is a number or not. The real result is true.
The zoologist one has already been talked about. The rest other than the 7th digit question are all false.
There are many different choices for the inputs, for example with the colour question
The 2nd colour in purple, yellow, arm, white and blue is?
There seems to be some popularity going on.
The first choice as input is yellow and the second choice is blue. To further test replacing yellow with black leads to blue as the first choice.
Then again even if you were to use the interpreted inputs you would have to determine the syntax for wolfram which last time I checked is not available and is basically a guess the syntax game.
If someone would care to enlighten me on how this could actually work I would greatly appreciate it, otherwise this method does not seem like it will work. Nice creativity though.
Even a 1/10 hit rate is sufficient. You get 10 questions from the website, return the results and one of them leads to your spam comment being posted. You then repeat that process thousands of times.
So for," What is seven hundred and forty four as a number? ", the interpreted input is a NumberQ function taking the main part "seven hundred and forty four as a number" and evaluating whether it is a number or not. The real result is true.
The zoologist one has already been talked about. The rest other than the 7th digit question are all false.
There are many different choices for the inputs, for example with the colour question
The 2nd colour in purple, yellow, arm, white and blue is?
There seems to be some popularity going on. The first choice as input is yellow and the second choice is blue. To further test replacing yellow with black leads to blue as the first choice. Then again even if you were to use the interpreted inputs you would have to determine the syntax for wolfram which last time I checked is not available and is basically a guess the syntax game.
http://webapps.stackexchange.com/q/1322/40
If someone would care to enlighten me on how this could actually work I would greatly appreciate it, otherwise this method does not seem like it will work. Nice creativity though.