Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

IANAL - is it technically infeasible for Apache to fork the language and call it something else? I think it's getting to the point where if the Java community really wants to continue using this language something drastic must be done.



Google tried that and ended up on the wrong end of a patent lawsuit. The Java community is just going to keep using OpenJDK like they do now. As evil as Snoracle is being, it's mostly a theoretical problem given that so few people use Harmony.


Android is based on Harmony...

http://apache-harmony.blogspot.com/2007/11/google-android-ap...

... for better or worse.


Uh, Android uses Harmony (or a subset thereof). I think that's a rather important detail to understanding what's happening here.


I don't think it has much to do with Android, for two reasons. Google doesn't care whether Harmony gets TCK-certified or not, and the Apache-Sun spat dates from early 2007, before Android was even announced. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Harmony#Difficulties_to_...


The article explicitly says that that isn't true (on page 2):

"It was thought that Google engineers used some of Project Harmony's code for the project, but the ASF has subsequently debunked this notion."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: