Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The press release barely mentions it but it's true. The free private repos are cut down, including bizarre hold-backs like wikis. GitHub's wikis aren't great, but why hold them back? It's kind of mind boggling.


You got it. Only the detailed pricing compared has what might be the full list of features removed. You have to scroll down ... https://github.com/pricing#feature-comparison

And look for the "Public repositories" note in the table.


Public repo wikis would get read by an arbitrary number of people. Private repo wikis would only get read by the 1 to 3 repo collaborators. So perhaps they thought it wouldn't be a big deal to disallow them.


But if it's such a small deal, why remove it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: