> the idea that this could become a weapon against disabled people
Possibly you're taking it a bit far there, but at least in England I could see that being the case. The lengths they go to to stop people getting benefits are ridiculous.
For example, Scotland now has devolved powers for benefits, and are being much more generous: Having a baby? Here's £300. Is it your first? Here's another £300. Twins? Another £300. Then they make sure you can apply for all this online.
In England they tried not to have an online presence because, "we don't want to make it too easy for people to apply."
If it's important enough that people should be aware of it, it's important enough to break an NDA over, although that might require a technical workaround such as posting under a throwaway account. Since this comment is already attached to your name that's impractical here, but it might be worth keeping in mind for other forums.
Someone may object that contracts are sacred. I don't care about contracts that are designed to conceal or perpetuate abusive behavior.
Possibly you're taking it a bit far there, but at least in England I could see that being the case. The lengths they go to to stop people getting benefits are ridiculous.
For example, Scotland now has devolved powers for benefits, and are being much more generous: Having a baby? Here's £300. Is it your first? Here's another £300. Twins? Another £300. Then they make sure you can apply for all this online.
In England they tried not to have an online presence because, "we don't want to make it too easy for people to apply."