> You seem to be assuming a single tunnel per direction. Assume 20 instead.
I think this is the really important part. Think of it like a computer bus - do you want a single channel able to move a lot of data at once but with potential bottlenecks as various systems fight to talk to each other, or lots of channels able to move medium amounts of data without bottlenecking one component while favouring another?
When one channel is at capacity you move to the next, with further redundancy to spare.
I think this is the really important part. Think of it like a computer bus - do you want a single channel able to move a lot of data at once but with potential bottlenecks as various systems fight to talk to each other, or lots of channels able to move medium amounts of data without bottlenecking one component while favouring another?
When one channel is at capacity you move to the next, with further redundancy to spare.