You're moving goalposts. Yes almost nobody changes the default merge-commit message. But that's because, like you, they don't know about --first-parent (or they just don't care about commit history)
That doesn't mean using merge-commits is wrong, that means people write bad commit messages, which you already complained about.
… am I moving goalposts? I do know about --first-parent and it is not intended to be a feature to make git logs readable. It gets rid of nearly the entire git history. At this point, you might as well simply go to the github page and look at merged PRs; that will actually get you something readable.
I fear you may be terribly misunderstanding the point of atomic commits and readable commit messages. Everything within a merge commit will still come up during a bisect, for example. If the commits are non-atomic and/or they are badly written, that is still an issue.
--first-parent hides the problem, and adds a new one. I'm not sure what your thinking is. Once again, what's more readable to you of all the screenshots I linked?
I haven't tested it all too thoroughly, but from what `git bisect view` tells me, this seems to work like a `git bisect --first-parent`. I'm wondering why there is no such option...
For anyone unfamiliar with git extension scripts: You should be able to put it in an executable (`chmod +x`) file (say `git-bisect-branch`) in your $PATH to make it usable (`git bisect-branch $bad $good...`).
git log --first-parent
With that switch and writing correct merge-commit messages you get the best of both approaches.