The complaint wasn't that it was worded poorly, but that a direct comparison was made at all, using kinda spooky language such as "It sounds suspiciously as if you're drawing a direct comparison" and "That can't possibly be an argument you really want to make.".
English isn't my first language, even I had no problem understanding the intention of the words, and arguing against the "strongest plausible interpretation" is in the guidelines.
> And then we can discuss how social norms and the legal system interact
Personally I'm content with it being settled that "few people care" is an invalid argument.
English isn't my first language, even I had no problem understanding the intention of the words, and arguing against the "strongest plausible interpretation" is in the guidelines.
> And then we can discuss how social norms and the legal system interact
Personally I'm content with it being settled that "few people care" is an invalid argument.