Frankly, I'm not going to read this article or evaluate its claims.
But it's interesting. Apple (mainly) and Amazon and a few others seems to have successfully turned the narrative to the question of whether or not Bloomberg got played.
At that point it seems like Bloomberg has to put forward something a lot more concrete than "X anonymous sources told us so" or lose all credibility. (Or they can retract, though at this point, after multiple double-downs, it would would take a wholesale editorial clearout and significant time to return to credibility.)
But it's interesting. Apple (mainly) and Amazon and a few others seems to have successfully turned the narrative to the question of whether or not Bloomberg got played.
At that point it seems like Bloomberg has to put forward something a lot more concrete than "X anonymous sources told us so" or lose all credibility. (Or they can retract, though at this point, after multiple double-downs, it would would take a wholesale editorial clearout and significant time to return to credibility.)