Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Wow, what an enormous rathole you have discovered.

Let me politely decline to explore this complex issue of justice, policing, and ethics -- one which probably should be decided case-by-case rather than by a one-size-fits-all rule -- and just point out that accepting patches from an apparently-insane convicted murderer is really, really bad P.R. for your open source project.




>accepting patches from an apparently-insane convicted murderer is really, really bad P.R. for your open source project.

Touche.


accepting patches from an apparently-insane convicted murderer is really, really bad P.R. for your open source project.

Curiously, the Oxford English Dictionary didn't have problems accepting contributions from their apparently-insane murderer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Chester_Minor


Yes, but it's harder to use an entry in the OED to send real-time messages to your opium supplier on the outside, coordinate your escape attempt, rob a bank, or open security holes that will allow Russian mobsters to 0wn the paper dictionary and use it to send out ads for authentic-whalebone penis extensions.

(That would be a funny steampunk novel.)

But, yes, this is the guy I had in mind when I said that you have to consider the question on a case-by-case basis.


accepting patches from an apparently-insane convicted murderer is really, really bad P.R. for your open source project

I wouldn't be so sure...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: