Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Since API's aren't standardized and conversion from one product to another likely requires development work and probably impacts your usage in some way even then - the barriers to switching are high enough that the availability of alternative maps still doesn't represent a whole lot of competition.


A good competitor can make a drop in replacement possible by aligning their api with that of google's


look how good it went for Microsoft's competitors trying to build a Win32-compatible OS....


Look what Linus and Stallman made to replace UNIX.


What? Like WINE you mean? ;-)


This argument is symmetric, it implies all other map providers (who are competitors of google maps and of each other) also have no competitors.


Sure, typically yes. It's not necessary - interoperable APIs exist, and for underdogs they're even attractive as a selling point - but market leaders tend not to play by those rules.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: