Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

These transitions are never fun but they happen sometimes. No API is eternal and it seems a little overwrought to be 'not trusting' Apple because they ditched an API (and entire OS) once, nearly 20 years ago.



Eternal is, of course, a very strong word, but I raise you POSIX, X11, and win32.


I think you have to see before you raise and each of these APIs has changed in incompatible ways over its lifetime. With the possible exception of POSIX which is more of a standard/serving suggestion of slightly-incompatible implementations to begin with.


GUIs made for X11 or Win32 20+ years ago have aged terribly.


But they still work, which is his point


Is that opinion? Do you have any research to show that people find them harder to use than modern UI?


Do you have an example of an X11 or Win32 app from 1995 which you think is especially usable today?


- xfig

- xterm

- Paint

- Wordpad

We can argue how useful those versions of Wordpad and Paint are, especially with modern file formats, but they are usable. I won't blame you for disagreeing with xterm, but over 30 after it was first shipped it's still the closest thing to a standard terminal, and the UI is decent once you get used to it (and much like emacs, it's partially jarring at first because it predates some expectations).




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: