Maybe they mean the area of ocean floor plowed > area of ocean, but the same parts of the ocean are being plowed over and over again by fishers. Most of the ocean is not being used for fishing.
Military networks have been substanially cut back in recent decades. The far north, and most all the southern oceans, are no longer a focus. No risk of russian subs, no listening.
Genuinely curious if you know: Has there been any effort to revisit this in recent years? I'm curious given the rise of China + Russia in the Arctic and China's demonstrated belligerence in the Indo-Pacific. [1,2]
Large ballistic missile submarine fleets and a military posture that makes an attempted first strike likely are the main reasons to maintain such a net.
China has 7 active ballistic missile submarines. The US has 35 active nuclear attack submarines.
It's probably cheaper to run a less thorough net and then task subs to shadow any contacts made.
>> Large ballistic missile submarine fleets and a military posture that makes an attempted first strike likely
It was in the past. Today such things can be used for all sorts of intel tasks. Sosus is real time info about positions/speeds of all ships, surface or not. Satellites cannot do that. I imagine that the US is also using sound to monitor Chinese building activities in the south china sea. There is also, probably, some economic intel to be gained by monitoring shipping/fishing fleets, again, in a way not easily replicated from space.
I would have thought the entire ocean is covered by now?