Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

California is 87% citizens compared to 93% for the country. That doesn't change the voting math much. But Wyoming citizens gets 7000% more Senate representation.



Back of a napkin calculations have California with around 25% of all immigrants in the US.

It's a pretty big chunk of EC votes - more than Wyoming gets in total!

The senate is meant to represent the states - not the people - so it's not really a fair comparison.


> It's a pretty big chunk of EC votes - more than Wyoming gets in total!

No, it's about the same. If you pull non-citizens out of the calculation nationally, California loses between 3 and 4 seats in the House.

> The senate is meant to represent the states - not the people

That's no more true than saying the House is supposed to be scaled to people and not citizens. Both are features of the design of the system. “Is supposed to be X” doesn't stop something from being a problem in terms of a goal other than X.


> doesn't stop something from being a problem in terms of a goal other than X

Sure - I guess it's the difference between a tweak and an overhaul. I'd expect the overhaul to have 100x the supporting evidence.


The reps are supposed to be proportioned based on people not citizens.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: