That license would not be "BSD", and what it was likely wouldn't be blessed by FSF/OSI/etc. (it doesn't meet the Open Source Definition, http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd and it’s probably not GPL-compatible), instantly making it suspect to lots of people.... Crockford got flak for adding a “The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil” clause, after all.[1] That would make it impossible for your code to be used by many open source projects.
[1] The FSF says “This is a restriction on usage and thus conflicts with freedom 0. The restriction might be unenforcible, but we cannot presume that. Thus, the license is nonfree.”
[1] The FSF says “This is a restriction on usage and thus conflicts with freedom 0. The restriction might be unenforcible, but we cannot presume that. Thus, the license is nonfree.”