Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think it will be the exact opposite.

Books and printed photos have survived so well because they do not have dependencies or require maintenance to be accessible to future generations.

Imagine if every book had a special bookstand that you needed to have to make the words appear. And books from different years or different countries use different bookstands. Sometimes a new edition of the book will be released, but it needs a new bookstand that can show this new version of the book.




> Books and printed photos have survived so well because they do not have dependencies or require maintenance to be accessible to future generations.

A large number of archivists and librarians (no, they're not the same job) just laughed uproariously.


> Books and printed photos have survived so well because...

They've survived so well because there's multiple copies of them. The higher the number of copies, the greater the chances that something will survive. And we live in an era of contents reproduced millions of times in a fully automated way, without any effort and in negligible time. Even if the constant copy and distribution of material over the internet and in data centers should cease at some point in the future, just think of all the copies of books and movies and pictures that are presently sitting in dusty hard drives inside dead laptops or at the back of some drawer.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: