Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As cliche as it is, the old saying "If X is illegal, only law-breakers will use X" applies here.


That's a tautology. And the set of law-breakers is neither a subset nor a superset of the set of immoral/unethical/bad/evil people.


That may be, but I think most would agree that law-abiders should not be, ipso facto, barred from activity that is not necessarily immoral/unethical/bad/evil.


I totally agree, and there's no implication the law-breakers have any specific morality.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: