I think they may be able to get around two-party consent laws if they never save the audio stream to disk, and only record the output of their audio processing function.
Interesting question - would love to hear an opinion from a lawyer.
Side question: What makes recording voicemail legal? Is there just a presumption that people understand that voicemail is a recording? I don't think I've ever heard a two-party consent warning before leaving a message.
Does the beep legally function as informing the other party?
Would it be illegal to record voicemail without the beep?
Would be cool if the government created a "recording consent" sound, so you could play it in lieu of spending 5 seconds to explain that you'll be recording. I suspect a beep does not qualify in most situations, would need to be more distinctive.
Saying "leave your message after the beep" seems unambiguous, but are fake messages where someone pretends to answer the phone in a legal gray area?
(I'd guess voicemail is a legally-ambiguous loophole that was grandfathered in because so much of the population understands it, but curious)
Interesting question - would love to hear an opinion from a lawyer.
Side question: What makes recording voicemail legal? Is there just a presumption that people understand that voicemail is a recording? I don't think I've ever heard a two-party consent warning before leaving a message.