Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think that Uber/Lyft could pretty easily argue A. The driver has control over the quality/cleanliness of the car, amount of conversation, extra perks provided, and timeliness of arrival.

While I agree element B would be difficult for them to overcome I would give it around 50/50 that they can successfully argue the drivers are not a part of the normal workplace.




Given that the job is "giving rides to other people in your car," how would B not apply?


The normal Uber workplace is the office where the app is developed, drivers never visit so they are not part of the normal work place. That argument or some other one that is equally dumb on it's face but might work in a court of law


I completely disagree. The normal Uber workplace for developers is the office. How many of the drivers do you think have ever set foot in that office?

To put it another way, if you're a plumber who is working for a plumbing company, are you doing your plumbing in the office?


> That argument or some other one that is equally dumb on it's face but might work in a court of law

> equally dumb

I was defending why I think there is a 50% shot that Uber could make part B not apply. It seems like you think it is more like a 1% shot which you might be right, I am not a lawyer.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: