> The threading, which they sell as the core feature, is nice, and does make it more usable for "important" conversations than purely chronological chat. It also makes it easier to screen out conversations you don't care about.
Does anyone have experience how this compares to the threading in Flowdock? I like their threading the best between the ones I've tried, but it doesn't allow you to skip or hide threads that aren't useful to you.
I'm still somewhat baffled by Slack's popularity as it's almost as bad as IRC on larger groups.
As news about Slack becomes fewer and farther in-between, reminders of how much more usable Flowdock was also fade from view. I'm left with a dead emptiness in my heart and a general pessimism about corporate communications.
Is there _any_ service with Flowdock style threading now? XMPP clients? Game chats?
Unfortunately they've taken a left turn on the quality front, at least for the iOS app. It was unmaintained and slightly buggy, but then it became maintained and slow, power-hungry, and extra-buggy, and new versions usually don't make it better. At least the macOS desktop app is still based on WebKit rather than Electron, so it doesn't guzzle battery.
They've added some handy features, and there are more in the pipeline, but the current mobile experience is so bad that I'm having trouble not looking at alternatives. This despite the threading and content model (inbox divorced from chat is amazing) that has kept me very loyal for a very long time.
Does anyone have experience how this compares to the threading in Flowdock? I like their threading the best between the ones I've tried, but it doesn't allow you to skip or hide threads that aren't useful to you.
I'm still somewhat baffled by Slack's popularity as it's almost as bad as IRC on larger groups.