Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You got down-voted because you dared to say that tax money gets wasted by bureaucrats. HN people worship government wealth redistribution programs and will never admit that they are often corrupt and wasteful.



He got downvoted because he has no understanding of how expensive it is to build a network of public wi-fi hotspots, and compared it to sticking his router beside his window and sharing his home broadband connection.

Literally everything about public wifi, from the wiring and build costs, to the hardware and antennas, to the bandwidth itself is significantly more expensive. $6,100 per point sounds completely reasonable.


This is just wrong, and missing the point.

The article states they are providing up to 834 people with internet access with 50+11 hot spots.

I shared a 20$ data plan with two+ travelmates while on gap year in Australia, and it worked extremely well. $7/person cost. Give or take for US data rates and inflation since then.

Even with generous assumptions, these wifi hot spots are at least 50x, and coule be 100x, that cost.

So worst case scenario, just buy them all smart phones and data plans for a small fraction of the cost of this current setup.


Not sure if it applies here, but cell towers also have limits. Especially if the area is somewhat remote (think music festivals, etc).


The simple fact is you could do it cheaper, but you either pay for expertise or hardware. If you don't have a skilled network guy volunteering time, it's going to cost, even if you do, it's going to cost only a bit less.


When you look at it from a marginal utility standpoint, it would have to be thousands of times more wasteful for it to be as wasteful as not redistributing it from the top.


hi, its me a guy who thinks that public programs are often wasteful and corrupt who also thinks that in many cases they are still probably a better idea than privitization


I see. I know my comments are often intended to strike debate, rather than state something I already know all will agree with. But maybe I should have been more clear that I am against waste and for better effective improvements in human welfare and dignity. I'm not againdt redistribution, just the way it is done.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: