That.. sort of supports my argument :-) He could cache it indefinitely instead o... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

skrebbel on Feb 27, 2018 | parent | context | favorite | on: Why Searching Through 500M Pwned Passwords Is So Q...

That.. sort of supports my argument :-) He could cache it indefinitely instead of 30 days if he's going to invalidate the cache anyway.

Bedon292 on Feb 27, 2018 [–]

I do appear to have misinterpreted what your point was. Sorry about that. Although I assume the idea was limiting how much is cached at any point on their part. Not sure it really matters though its not that much data.

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact