Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems pretty appropriate to use CWA's past as an argument against CWA, since the article is about CWA.


Well they haven't actually used their past actions, they've just said that they've been "failed". Seems like if you're on an anti-union bend you could give specifics rather than vague complaints?


> Seems like if you're on an anti-union bend you could give specifics rather than vague complaints?

I'm not the person complaining about CWA. That's the user "packetized."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: