Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The headline is misleading, they haven't approved the design yet. However, they've been able to certify that the reactor does not need a certain standard of backup power supply and electrical circuitry due to the passive safety features of the design. This standard essentially requires that nuclear power plants have a connection to the grid and an on site backup generator to safety systems that are on completely separate circuits from the nuclear power plant electrical generation systems.

Not having to do this makes it cheaper for NuScale to deploy powerplants. And it also makes it easier for them to build powerplants in remote places where a connection to the electrical grid is not available[0].

[0]https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1616/ML16169A148.pdf




Thanks, we've revised the headline to use less misleading language from the article.

Edit: submitted title was "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approves NuScale Power’s Advanced Reactor".


When you do this would it be possible to include the old headline in your comment?

Without it comments like the GP are harder to understand what exactly they are speaking to.


FWIW, you can often find this by going to the Google cached version of this page (in this case: "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approves NuScale Power’s Advanced Reactor"), though I agree, it would be useful to include.


We usually do. I'll add it above.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: