Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Antidotes are not data. We have no reason to believe from your story that your would not have got skin cancer if he had spent all his time in a cave. Or maybe he wouldn't have, because he would have died of something even worse at 45.

Science is trying to work this out, it is complex. We know that sun exposure both protects from and causes skin cancer depending on the study. This is a complex subject, the only thing I think I can safely say is don't get a sunburn.




You're completely incorrect:

https://wiki.cancer.org.au/skincancerstats/Settings:_Workpla...

It is estimated that around 200 melanomas and 34,000 non-melanoma skin cancers per year are caused by occupational exposures in Australia.[1]

http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/PreventingCancer/BeSuns...

The 2006 Report on indicators for occupational disease highlights there was an increase in skin cancer claims per million employees/persons over a six-year period to 2004. The report says that given the long latency period associated with exposure and the onset of skin cancer, it is also likely that compensation claims greatly understate the real incidence of occupational skin cancer6 .


In this case his one point of data would be enough to refute the original claim.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: