Wow. What would be the possible reason for blocking incognito?
You still get the full ad experience? I can't support any company that is demanding that they not only serve their ads but also be allowed to track the visitor after.
> Wow. What would be the possible reason for blocking incognito?
This is what the blocking page reads:
> Visitors are allowed 3 free articles per month (without a subscription), and private browsing prevents us from counting how many stories you've read.
Visitors are allowed 3 free articles per month (without a subscription), and private browsing prevents us from counting how many stories you've read. We hope you understand, and consider subscribing for unlimited online access.
-----------
It's not about ads, it's about free access before a paywall.
Yeah but I mean, if the mechanism they're using relies on not using incognito, that means you should just be able to delete their cookies and keep getting access.
It says in the 'error' screen why they are blocking incognito.. so that they can accurately count how many articles you have read. Seems fair enough to me.
uBlock Origin seems unaffected (but private browsing still trips it.) Overall, I just exit the page and don't even consider switching off my adblocker, so it hardly matters to me, personally. I imagine most people are on the same boat.
umatrix here. I saw 1 cookie (from techreview itself), although enabling googletagservices/etc leads to more techreview cookies. Enabled everything google and it still wasn't good enough for them. If it's not google doing their tracking work, that's just being awkward.