Value is only created when you sell products, not when you create them (and especially not in R&D which is gamble cost for most companies), otherwise all the startups would be rich. If there would be no value creation in France, Apple would not have any business there.
Ridiculous, how would that even work? Profit is “sales - expenses.” So how would Apple account for the R&D in the states, or does Apple France just want to tax them assuming all the inputs don’t exist?
That’s why Apple USA sells iPhones to Apple France at some price above hardware production costs. It doesn’t make sense any other way. Value isn’t created on sale, it is only realized as money at that point.
Welcome to the world of tax avoidance. For example, if the software is assigned to a subsidiary in the Isle of Man, which "licenses" the use of the software to Google France, then Google France in the high tax jurisdiction pays these licensing fees to Google Isle of Man, shifting profits from the high tax to the low tax jurisdiction. This is one of many tricks available.
See this Forbes' article on transfer pricing as tax avoidance:
R&D is a cost center, not a profit center and as you pointed out, you need to sell your products at a higher price to recover that cost. If the value was created on R&D, it would mean that you could manufacture just about anything and it would create profit magically, which is obviously wrong as countless companies fail to monetize products. The value is created at the time you sell the product itself, by demand of consumers.
R&D is not a cost center, it is widely regarded as a profit center in a tech company. By your definition, Microsoft (assuming they aren’t selling hardware) should be paying all of its profits to where its software is sold vs. where it is produced, because it’s entire operation is just a cost center!
Like it or not, taxation internationally is currently based on where value is produced which is why...
> Under the current international tax system, profits are taxed based on where the value is created. The taxes Apple pays to countries around the world are based on that principle. The vast majority of the value in our products is indisputably created in the United States — where we do our design, development, engineering work and much more — so the majority of our taxes are owed to the US.
The value is not created at time of sale! Well, some value is created by virtue of the sale itself that go into retail profits, but the store has to pay its suppliers the price they charge regardless of the supplier’s markup. Imagine it’s a department store (Nordstrom’s or whatever) selling LV bags, LV is not charging the department stores just production cost. France in turn is taxing LV on the design value added in France, that tax money isn’t going to China or the USA where the bag is sold. France would be pissed otherwise.
If France wants to tax America’s R&D, then they can change their laws, but the USA isn’t going to be very happy about that, obviously.
Apple is heavily biased on the subject so I would not take their PR at face value. It's in their best interest to pretend that all the value is created in the US in order to reduce taxes.
Let's say I can recreate the new IPhone with only 1/1000 of the budget of Apple's R&D, would I make a profit? Yes of course I would. If Apple could create their new IPhone for only 100$ of total R&D, be sure they would do it.
On the other hand, ask yourself why there is no Apple Store in a lot of African countries. It's because Apple does not meet the local markets requirements for a store there to be profitable, so they would not get any value out of it.
R&D being a cost center is the reason most of the countries in the world have tax-breaks specifically on R&D and also why the copyright laws are that harsh to prevent ripping of all the value by selling copies of your competitor.
If Apple was able to realize their R&D value income taxes in France rather than the USA on all French sales, they would probably pay less, not more, than what they are now.
At anyrate, value is well defined across the world. If it was define the way you want, the countries would see all their exporters as freeloaders, not paying for the infrastructure that is realizing their profit. Heck, places like Switzerland and Singapore wouldn’t be able to survive.
> If Apple was able to realize their R&D value income taxes in France rather than the USA on all French sales, they would probably pay less, not more, than what they are now.
Tax breaks are on R&D, not sales and Apple does not have any R&D in France so I don't follow you...
> At anyrate, value is well defined across the world.
There's no common tax laws across the world so this does not seem to be true.
> Sales is not the only source of value to be had. It is weird that you are on this site and think development is value free.
I find it the opposite, I find weird that you are on this site and think value magically appears out of R&D since the countless startups which are failing every month... Just look at YCombinator data from the past 5 year and I bet most of the startups back then (which had products) failed because they did not generate enough revenue to sustain themselves.
