Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't know. This makes me think of a piano that at random times plays a random note - and sometimes it sounds good. I guess the difference is that photography isn't real time, so the photographer can throw out all the ones that don't look good. OTOH, I think I'd rather put my efforts into adding weird effects to better images than hoping for the best.



A better analogy might be "A piano that's hard or impossible to control with complete accuracy, but often produces beautiful accidents"


It's more like a piano played through a tube amplifier. It can add character, if you're into that, and it can't be reproduced well with digital effects.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: