Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Or just broken into 2+ tweets.



Or broken into 10, 20, or more tweets.

Which, to me, is the disappointing thing about the new character limit: it does nothing to address this emerging usage pattern, one might even say emerging form of communication, of the tweetstorm.

It seems pretty clear that tweetstorms enable a certain mode of marshaling thoughts and communicating them in an off-the-cuff way that blogging services never identified or understood. And yet Twitter's product org doesn’t seem to understand it either.


Maybe something intermediate could be done, but I think the tweetstorm format allows for interjections at fixed intervals, which can be helpful.


Didn't really think of this before, but yes - this is very useful and it would be a shame to lose this feature.


That’s part of the missed opportunity I see: far from losing this ability, a proper tweetstorm feature should embrace it, making it easier to navigate and interact with.


> easier to navigate and interact with

On the contrary, it's harder to navigate because it is intermingled with all sorts of boxes, whitespace, tags, icons and hidden menus. Everything is hair-triggered by a touch making the whole page unstable. Tweetstorms fork into secondary threads that are hard to follow, unlike HN or reddit, and use 3 screens for content that fits on half a screen.


For some reason Twitter had decided to attempt to make their page behave like a UI rather than a forum or similar.

Thus we only get a single linear reading, and it wastes space by being presented as a floating "windows" above the main page.

Never mind that it is damn hard to see the full image, as no amount of clicking will actually make it fill the whole screen. Only bringing up the tweet "window" and then right clicking the image gets anywhere close.


At least they stopped requiring 100% of my processor to display them like when they first switched to the floating, easy to accidentally dismiss boxes.


Yep, I think Tweetstorms are right up there with colds and bad dates for negative experiences. Or, better said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7bekig/an_inte...


Sort of like how you can "interject" via quoting in email? ;)


That's, increasingly, apparently not understood by the average correspondent. Anything other than a continuous block of text preceding a quoted reply ("top posting") may cause confusion.


Don't worry about it, if you are ever confronted, simply explain it. It is a tradition worth defending.


I've found top-posting the type of email fixes this, no failures yet:

Please see my responses inline

> can we make the page do this

yes np

> Does the flux capacitor have enough jiggawatts to make this work?

It does if we don't add anything new

> etc


With the right client support (collapsed tweetstorms and stats), readers could delve as deeply into a topic as they were interested, and writers could see how far most readers cared to delve. That's seemed like a no-brainer development in Twitter for some time to me. Entire articles could be written and released in such a format.


This is the company that dreamed up lists, only to hide them behind multiple layers of UI rather than provide the ability to display them in columns front and center.


Twitter is experimenting with a feature that lets you compose tweetstorms [1]

[1]: https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/10/16284526/twitter-experime...


In particular as they could just as well have lifted the inline signaling that sms has for stitching multiple messages together to form a long one.

After all, the start of Twitter was as a sms relay.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: